08 March 2016

BEPS and the impact on the consumer sector in Europe

In October 2015, the OECD presented its final package of measures to address “base erosion and profit shifting” (or BEPS) and to bring about the “comprehensive, coherent and co-ordinated reform of the international tax rules”.

The outcome of an ambitious and broad ranging two year plan, the BEPS agenda covered 15 “Action Items”, each designed to provide governments and revenue authorities with tools to close the purported gaps in their tax revenues.  These tools consist of international treaty rules (including common standards to be adopted), model domestic legislation and other guidance – some of which will be implemented immediately (such as revisions to the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines).  

Recently the European Commission has published its own ambitious anti-tax avoidance package, the aim of which is to ensure that member states take a co-ordinated stance both on the implementation of the BEPS project and against tax avoidance. Please read our article on this topic, recently published in Tax Journal.

The breadth and complicated nature of the BEPS package means that its effect will vary significantly from business to business. The consumer sector can expect to be affected by, amongst other issues, potential limitations on interest deductibility, changes to the UK patent box regime, changes to double tax treaties to prevent treaty shopping and to the treaty definition of “permanent establishment”, changes to the OECD transfer pricing guidelines and increased reporting requirements.  In the UK a forerunner of part of the BEPS package, the diverted profits tax, is already in force.

The European Commission is also currently reviewing a large number of national tax rulings to assess whether the rulings are compatible with the EU’s state aid rules or whether they allow certain multinationals to inappropriately reduce the amount of tax due. A key focus of the Commission’s recent rulings is that FIAT, Starbucks and more recently certain Belgian based multinationals were in receipt of illegal state aid related to the fact that certain arrangements (including transfer pricing arrangements) did not respect the normal “arms-length principle”. Those found in receipt of illegal state aid have to repay the aid plus interest. In the case of FIAT and Starbucks, this has resulted in recovery orders of between €20-30m each. The cases are under appeal. 

These BEPS changes and state aid rulings will require analysis of current domestic and international structures, a review of tax compliance and reporting systems, and, in some cases, a review of whether there is sufficient “substance" in particular jurisdictions.  

The Consumer Group at KWM understands the significant potential impact these measures represent to our consumer clients and the industry generally and will be keeping our clients up to date with developments. We are monitoring how the UK government and other governments around the world are planning to implement the BEPS package. In tables on our website we summarise how the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Spain, Australia and China have implemented the BEPS package so far. 

After the UK’s Budget on 16th March we will be reporting on the UK Budget BEPS proposals, for example, in relation to interest deductibility.

In the meantime, if you would like further information on any of the above or to discuss the impact of the BEPS package on your business, please speak to your usual KWM contact or Heather Corben.

A Guide to Doing Business in China

We explore the key issues being considered by clients looking to unlock investment opportunities in the People’s Republic of China.

Doing Business in China
Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
    You might also be interested in

    The EIF has become invaluable for many venture and smaller buyout funds; a number of which may not have been raised without the EIF's cornerstone investment and subsequent support

    11 November 2016

    Under AIFMD, marketing a private equity or venture capital fund in the EU has either got somewhat easier, or considerably harder – depending on access to a marketing passport.

    04 November 2016

    The AIFMD’s “third country passport” may be available in some non-EU countries relatively soon, but questions remain on how to opt in and what happens to National Private Placement Rules.

    30 September 2016

    To mark the milestone of the 700th edition of Private Equity Comment we welcome Michael Collins, Invest Europe’s Public Affairs Director as guest author.

    09 September 2016

    You may also be interested in...

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.